🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Across Europe, a growing number of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our kids' innocence". The policy may be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to approve a law lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is provided. Although it warns of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a solid foundation," commented a leading MEP behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some figures to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Beyond these regions, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations adopt a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this international discussion continues, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that states around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.