🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.