🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A effort to remove the history of people of color and experience from the archives is under way. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the observance illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an period that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.